TODAYS DATE: Thursday Sep 02, 2010 YOUR ONLINE RESOURCE FOR NEWS ABOUT MESOTHELIOMA

Researchers Consider the Role of Gender in Surviving Mesothelioma

Monday, August 30th, 2010

It’s more common for men to develop pleural mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung, than women. That’s likely due to the greater presence of men in the kinds of heavy industrial jobs such as ship building, mining and automotive repair where asbestos was prevalent, particularly in earlier decades.

Still, mesothelioma is not exclusive to men or gender specific. Women also develop the disease associated with asbestos exposure, sometimes from laundering the dust-covered clothes of a family member who brings home asbestos on their work clothing. A group of researchers at Brigham and Woman’s Hospital in Boston, Mass., has published a new study in the Annals of Thoracic Surgery evaluating the role of gender in survival with mesothelioma.

The researchers examined the cases of more than 700 patients who underwent surgery at Brigham and Woman’s Hospital between 1987 and 2008 to treat mesothelioma. Of the patients, approximately 145 were women.

The researchers observed that women generally tended to develop the disease at a younger age and to live longer with the disease after surgery. Given that, the researchers say women patients with mesothelioma are good candidates for aggressive treatments. including extrapleural pneumonectomy, surgery to remove a diseased lung and surrounding layer of tissue known as the pleura. It is one of the major curative procedures performed on patients with mesothelioma, but not all patients are healthy enough to undergo the invasive surgery.

According to federal statistics compiled by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 14,598 men and 3,485 women died of malignant pleural mesothelioma between 1999 and 2005 in the United States.

Asbestos Fuels Mesothelioma Epidemic in Hong Kong

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

With a booming Asian economy, Hong Kong used asbestos extensively in the 1950s and 1960s, particularly in the shipyard and construction industries. Asbestos exposure is closely associated with asbestos-related respiratory diseases such as pleural mesothelioma that often appear decades after workers inhale asbestos fibers.

Since 2000, Hong Kong has experienced an epidemic of malignant mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs or abdomen, according to a recent article in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. The epidemic parallels the peak usage of asbestos in the early 1960s since symptoms of asbestos-related disease typically take 30 to 40 years to appear.

Researchers from Australia and China predict that the number of cases of mesothelioma in Hong Kong will peak around 2014, then slowly taper off based on data from the Hong Kong Cancer Registry.

Malignant mesothelioma was rare before the 1950s, but has increased sharply since the 1970s in many parts of the world. Exposure to asbestos in the workplace is considered the highest risk factor for developing asbestos cancer.

The researchers observed a notable increase in incidence of mesothelioma from 1976 to 2006 in Hong kong. The highest incidence was among males 70 years or older.

The increasing incidence of mesothelioma in Hong Kong is similar to trends observed in many countries including France, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Australia and Japan. The number of cases of mesothelioma in the United States, which restricts asbestos use, has increased to 2,500 to 3,000 a year. The incidence of mesothelioma in many South American countries such as Brazil is expected to keep rising for 10 to 20 more years because of later restrictions on asbestos use.

Hong Kong banned the import and sale of blue asbestos (crocidolite) and brown asbestos (amosite) in 1996. But the country has allowed the continued use of chrysotile asbestos in various industries. While the asbestos industry has claimed that chrysotile asbestos is less toxic than other forms, health organizations have said chrysotile asbestos is a human carcinogen and also causes malignant mesothelioma.

Given the continuing use of chrysotile asbestos in Hong Kong, the researchers predict the mesothelioma epidemic will continue in Hong Kong.

Majority of World’s Population Still Exposed to Asbestos and its Deadly Effects

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

The use of asbestos has dropped from more than 4 million metric tons to 2.1 million metric tons in the past 25 years as one country after another has banned the cancer-causing mineral fiber. Yet, a majority of the world’s population still lives in countries including the United States that do not ban asbestos or asbestos-containing products. And demand for asbestos is surging in industrializing countries such as China and India where safeguards on worker exposure are weak or non-existent.

Today, the top users of asbestos are China, Russia, India, Kazakhstan and Brazil. These countries export asbestos-containing products to other countries including the U.S. where the products are used in the automotive and construction industries and pose an ongoing threat of asbestos exposure. Asbestos causes about half the of total deaths from workplace-related cancers such as mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen, according to the World Health Organization.

While the U.S. stopped mining asbestos and producing asbestos in 2002, according to a recent article in Environmental Health Perspectives, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, U.S. companies imported more than 1,400 metric tons on chrysotile asbestos, primarily from Canada, in 2008. Much of it is used for roofing products. In addition, the U.S. imports large quantities of asbestos-containing products such as cement pipe, asbestos-lined brake pads and gaskets.

According to global estimates reported by the World Health Organization 125 million people are exposed to asbestos in the workplace and more than 107,000 people die each year from asbestos-related mesothelioma, lung cancer and asbestosis resulting from occupational exposures. Many experts believe current estimates of asbestos-related disease and deaths understate the actual numbers. Since mesothelioma did not receive its own classification in the International Classification of Diseases until the mid-1990s, many asbestos-related deaths were not classified as such.

Given the decades-long latency period from exposure to asbestos to development of mesothelioma, the epidemic of asbestos-related diseases is still spreading and will for decades to come, particularly in countries still heavily using asbestos.

Asbestos Diseases May Claim More than 10 Million Lives, International Ban Needed

Monday, August 9th, 2010

By Wade Rawlins

All asbestos causes malignant mesothelioma and other forms of cancer. Yet even today, a large number of countries continue to import and export asbestos and use asbestos products. A ban is urgently needed on all forms of asbestos, according to an international academic society that analyzes critical occupational and environmental health issues.

In a new article in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, 16 occupational health researchers from the U.S., Great Britain, Japan, Italy, Canada, India and South Africa —representing the Collegium Ramazzini — write that the profound tragedy is that all illnesses and deaths related to asbestos are preventable. Yet the incidence of asbestos disease increases. The researchers say the risks of asbestos exposure cannot be controlled by technology or by workplace practices. They call for a worldwide ban on the mining and manufacture of all forms of asbestos.

Decades after asbestos was declared a human carcinogen, about 125 million people around the world remain exposed to asbestos at their workplaces, according to the World Health Organization. An estimated 43,000 people died of mesothelioma in 2000 and a much larger number of lung cancer deaths were due to workplace exposure to asbestos. In the U.S., about 2,500 to 3,000 people die of mesothelioma each year and thousands more from lung cancer. Asbestos diseases may claim as many as 10 million people before asbestos is banned worldwide and all exposure is halted, the researchers say.

Despite industry claims to the contrary, all forms of asbestos cause asbestosis, a progressive lung disease as well as mesothelioma, lung cancer and cancer of the larynx. Mesothelioma is an incurable cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen closely linked to asbestos-exposure. Typically, people who inhale asbestos fibers do not notice any symptoms of disease for 30 years or longer after exposure.

Fifty-two countries, including all members of the European Union, now ban all forms of asbestos. Yet many countries including the United States still import asbestos and make and use asbestos products. A number of countries that ban some forms of asbestos make an exception for chrysotile asbestos, which accounts for nearly 100 percent of the asbestos mined today and about 95 percent of the asbestos ever mined.

The asbestos industry claims that asbestos-related cancers are caused by forms of mineral fiber other than chrysotile asbestos and that chrysotile poses less risk to workers. But scientists and physicians generally agree that chrysotile causes various cancers including mesothelioma and lung cancer. Numerous studies refute industry reports that chrysotile is safe, according to the researchers.

Russia is now the leading producer of asbestos, followed by China, Kazakhstan, Brazil, Canada, Zimbabwe and Colombia. Most asbestos production occurs in Eastern Europe and Asia, often with little or no protection of workers or surrounding communities. Asbestos cement accounts for more than 85 percent of worldwide production.

“Scientists, physicians and responsible authorities in countries allowing the use of asbestos should have no ‘illusion’ that controlled use of chrysotile asbestos is an effective alternative to a ban on all use of asbestos,” the researchers say.

Proposed Factory Demolition Underscores Ongoing Risk of Asbestos Exposure

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

The owner of a former West Virginia pottery factory is at odds with state environmental regulators over the demolition of crumbling buildings that contain toxic asbestos.

The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection has gone to court to bar contractor Nick Masciarelli from demolishing the former Taylor Smith & Taylor pottery factory, contending that he has refused to remove the asbestos properly, according to a report in The Charleston Gazette.

Demolition and remodeling activities are a primary source of exposure to asbestos today. If demolition workers, asbestos removal workers and construction workers are not equipped with proper safety gear or don’t employ techniques to suppress and contain asbestos fibers, the toxic fibers or fine dust can disperse in the air and be inhaled and trapped in a worker’s lung. Over time, the fibers can cause scarring and inflammation, affecting breathing and causing serious respiratory disease including mesothelioma, an incurable cancer that affects the lining of the lung or abdomen. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common form.

Masciarelli, who purchased the property about 18 months ago, with plans to demolish the buildings, said he can’t remove the asbestos the way that state environmental regulators want because the crumbling factory buildings are dangerously unstable and unsafe for his workers to enter. A hearing is scheduled on Aug. 24.

A manufacturer of dinnerware, Taylor Smith & Taylor began in Chester, W. Virginia in 1899. TS&T was bought out in the early 1970s and closed in 1981.

While use of asbestos is limited today in the United States, new cases of mesothelioma can occur through exposure to asbestos during remediation and demolition of buildings containing asbestos if controls are insufficient to protect workers and the surrounding community. An estimated 1.3 million construction and general industry workers potentially are being exposed to asbestos today, according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

More Oversight of Private Asbestos Inspectors After NY Case Shows Gaps

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

New York City environmental regulators are making changes to the city’s program that licenses and monitors private asbestos inspectors after a recent criminal case revealed significant lapses in oversight.

Former asbestos inspector, Saverio F. Todaro, pleaded guilty in March in federal court to environmental crimes and fraud, admitting to falsifying hundreds of reports that buildings were free of asbestos, though he never surveyed them. In fact, Todaro continued to falsify reports even after the city had suspended his license in 2004 for excessive notices of violation.

The case raised serious concerns about the oversight of New York’s more than 500 private asbestos inspectors who are licensed by the city. It also prompted questions about how many people were exposed to asbestos because of the fraud and lapses in oversight. Asbestos exposure is associated with serious respiratory disease including mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen, and lung cancer.

The city conducted a two-month internal review of its program and areas where improvements in oversight were needed.

In a memorandum obtained by The New York Times, the New York Department of Environmental Protection said it plans to increase the annual number of field inspections and nearly double the office audits of private asbestos inspectors. The city agency will share its database of licensing information to alert state and federal regulatory agencies of inspectors with suspended or revoked licenses. It plans to convert to an Internet-based filing system that will automatically reject asbestos surveys by inspectors whose licenses have been suspended or revoked.

Before older buildings are remodeled or demolished, building owners are required to survey a structure for the presence of asbestos. Certified asbestos investigators are hired to do that. All asbestos fibers must be carefully contained and removed before a building is remodeled or demolished because asbestos dust, if inhaled, can cause serious respiratory disease including mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of lungs or abdomen.

Spanish Court Orders Compensation for Victims of Environmental Exposure to Asbestos

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

In a landmark ruling on asbestos, a court in Spain has ordered a manufacturer to pay millions of euros in compensation to residents whose health was damaged by decades of environmental exposure to asbestos.

The Spanish building materials company, Uralita, was ordered to pay the equivalent of $4.9 million to 45 people who lived near an asbestos-cement factory in a Barcelona suburb for “damage to the lungs, leading in some cases to death,” according to the French news agency, Agence France Presse.

Asbestos exposure causes serious respiratory disease including malignant mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen, lung cancer, and non-cancer conditions such as asbestosis, a chronic scarring of the lungs that causing difficulty breathing. More than 125 million people are exposed to asbestos in the workplace today, according to the World Health Organization.

The legal decision is a landmark because it’s the first time that a court in Spain has ordered a company to compensate local residents for health issues related to environmental exposure to asbestos, according to the Spanish daily newspaper El Pais. Previous awards have been to workers who developed health problems after occupational exposure to asbestos in their workplace.

Asbestos was widely used in construction products such as insulation, tile, pipe and for fire-proofing. The Uralita factory used asbestos in the manufacture of cement for decades until use of the mineral fiber was banned in Spain in 2001. The company has said it will appeal.

More than 40 countries including all member states of the European Union have banned all forms of asbestos. Other countries including the United States have restricted asbestos, but continue to allow its use in the manufacture of certain products.

Workers Exposed to Asbestos Face Higher Risk of Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Every year, 2,000 to 3,000 Americans die of mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen that develops from inhaling microscopic asbestos fibers. Asbestos also contributes to countless thousands of additional deaths from lung cancer every year.

Breathing asbestos increases the likelihood of developing mesothelioma and lung cancer and other non-malignant respiratory diseases such as asbestosis, according to cancer experts. According to the National Cancer Society, approximately one in seven people who suffer from asbestosis, a chronic scarring of the lung caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos, eventually develop lung cancer. The higher the exposure to asbestos, the higher the risk of lung cancer.

Researchers have identified a number of factors that contribute to the development of cancer in non-smokers. Asbestos tops the lists. Non-smoking asbestos workers face a five-fold risk of developing lung cancer as compared to other non-smokers, according to an article in The New York Times.

The risk is magnified in asbestos workers who smoke. Smokers who have been exposed to asbestos face a far higher risk of developing lung cancer. Smoking acts with asbestos to greatly enhance the risk of cancer.

Asbestos has been used in thousands of products such as roofing shingles, water supply pipes, plastic fillers as well as clutches, brake linings and gaskets for motor vehicles. In recent decades, the use of asbestos has declined since the late 1970s, and more than 40 countries have banned the use of all forms of asbestos. Today, asbestos is restricted in the United States, but not banned. People may still be exposed during demolition or remodeling of buildings containing asbestos or in workplaces that still use asbestos. Some occupations such as demolition workers, plumbers and pipe fitters have a higher risk of exposure and higher likelihood of developing asbestos-related disease.

Canada Health Groups Urge Halt to Asbestos Mining, Ban on Exports

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

A group of Canadian health organizations called on the national and provincial governments to halt the mining of asbestos in Quebec and ban exports of the hazardous mineral fiber. Asbestos is linked to mesothelioma and other fatal respiratory diseases that cause tens of thousands of deaths each year.

The Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Public Health Association, and the National Specialty Society for Community Medicine condemned Canada’s practice of providing financial subsidies to the asbestos industry and promoting exports of asbestos to developing nations that lack worker safety laws.

“More than 40 countries, including all member states of the European Union, have banned the use of all forms of asbestos including Chrysotile,” Dr. Cordell Neudorf, chairman of the Canadian Public Health Association Board of Directors, said in a press release. “There is clear scientific evidence that exposure to asbestos through mining, processing and use is harmful to health.”

While Canada strictly regulates use of asbestos within its borders, the country ranks as the world’s fifth largest exporter of Chrysotile asbestos. Much of the asbestos goes to developing countries where lax workplace safety regulations expose workers and their families to inhaling microscopic asbestos fibers, extending the epidemic of asbestos-related disease into new generations. Ninety-six percent of the output from the country remaining asbestos mines, both in Quebec, is exported to countries such as India and Indonesia.

“It is inconceivable that we would restrict the use of asbestos in our own country, but continue to export this hazardous material around the world,” Dr. Anne Doig, president of the Canadian Medical Association said in a statement.

The government of Quebec is currently considering extending a $58 million government loan guarantee to allow the reopening on the shuttered Jeffrey asbestos mine, one of the world’s largest open pit asbestos mines. The expansion would create 400 jobs in the town of Asbestos, Quebec, and keep Canada in the asbestos market for 25 years.

The health organizations urged the provincial government not to subsidize the reopening of the Jeffrey mine. Instead they said, all levels of Canadian government should direct new investments to support the transition of asbestos mining regions toward environmentally healthy and sustainable industries.

The World Health Organization, which has called for a ban on asbestos, estimates that 90,000 people die of asbestos related disease each year. In the U.S., approximately 2,500 to 3,000 people die of mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen linked to asbestos exposure.

California Reconsiders State Symbol Associated with Chrysotile Asbestos

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

For more than 40 years, California’s official state rock has been serpentine, a greenish gray rock linked to the state’s gold rush.

But serpentine is a primary source of asbestos, a mineral fiber that causes serious respiratory disease in humans including mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs or abdomen. Chrysotile asbestos, the most widely used commercial form of asbestos, comes from serpentine

Because asbestos is a human carcinogen and California has the highest rate of mesothelioma deaths in the nation, a California lawmaker has filed legislation to strip serpentine of its status as an official state symbol and make a statement of findings about the increased risk of mesothelioma associated with chrysotile asbestos.

The bill, introduced by Sen. Gloria Romero, a Los Angeles Democrat, says, “Serpentine contains the deadly mineral chrysotile asbestos, a known carcinogen… California should not designate a rock known to be toxic to the health of its residents as the state’s official rock.”

The California Assembly Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday approved the legislation, stripping serpentine of its official designation and sent the bill to the Assembly floor for consideration. An earlier version of Romero’s bill previously passed the California Senate.

Copyright About Mesothelioma.net
Website by Consultwebs.com